888 casino app real money
The Prime Minister insisted the UK will back Ukraine “for as long as it takes” as he made a speech at the Lord Mayor’s Banquet in London, but for the first time acknowledged the conflict could move towards a negotiated end. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has in recent weeks suggested he is open to a possible ceasefire with Vladimir Putin’s Russia. Kyiv and its European allies meanwhile fear the advent of Donald Trump’s return to the White House could result in American aid being halted. President-elect Trump has said he would prefer to move towards a peace deal, and has claimed he could end the conflict on “day one” of his time in power. As he attempts to strike up a good relationship with the incoming president, Sir Keir revealed he had told Mr Trump the UK “will invest more deeply than ever in this transatlantic bond with our American friends in the years to come”. In his speech at London’s Guildhall, the Prime Minister said there is “no question it is right we support Ukraine”, as the UK’s aid to Kyiv is “deeply in our self-interest”. Allowing Russia to win the war would mean “other autocrats would believe they can follow Putin’s example,” he warned. Sir Keir added: “So we must continue to back Ukraine and do what it takes to support their self-defence for as long as it takes. “To put Ukraine in the strongest possible position for negotiations so they can secure a just and lasting peace on their terms that guarantees their security, independence, and right to choose their own future.” Mr Zelensky told Sky News over the weekend he would be open to speaking with Mr Putin, but branded the Russian president a “terrorist”. He also suggested Ukrainian territory under his control should be taken under the “Nato umbrella” to try to stop the “hot stage” of the war with Russia. In a banquet speech focused on foreign affairs, the Prime Minister said it was “plain wrong” to suggest the UK must choose between its allies, adding: “I reject it utterly. “(Clement) Attlee did not choose between allies. (Winston) Churchill did not choose. “The national interest demands that we work with both.” Sir Keir said the UK and the US were “intertwined” when it came to commerce, technology and security. The Prime Minister added: “That’s why, when President Trump graciously hosted me for dinner in Trump Tower, I told him that we will invest more deeply than ever in this transatlantic bond with our American friends in the years to come.” He also repeated his commitment to “rebuild our ties with Europe” and insisted he was right to try to build closer links with China. “It is remarkable that until I met President Xi last month there had been no face-to-face meeting between British and Chinese leaders for six years,” the Prime Minister said. “We can’t simply look the other way. We need to engage. To co-operate, to compete and to challenge on growth, on security concerns, on climate as well as addressing our differences in a full and frank way on issues like Hong Kong, human rights, and sanctions on our parliamentarians,” he added. The Prime Minister said he wants Britain’s role in the world to be that of “a constant and responsible actor in turbulent times”. He added: “To be the soundest ally and to be determined, always, in everything we do. “Every exchange we have with other nations, every agreement we enter into to deliver for the British people and show, beyond doubt, that Britain is back.” Ahead of Sir Keir’s speech, Lord Mayor Alastair King urged the Prime Minister and his Government to loosen regulations on the City of London to help it maintain its competitive edge. In an echo of Sir Keir’s commitment to drive the UK’s economic growth, the Lord Mayor said: “The idealist will dream of growth, but the pragmatist understands that our most effective machinery to drive growth is here in the City, in the hands of some of the brightest and most committed people that you will find anywhere in the world.”When dockworkers walked the picket line in October, the strike lasted for 3 days. And if a new contract between their 45,000 member union and the U.S. Maritime Alliance isn't signed by mid-January — a longer strike could send inflation going in the wrong direction. Just months after a strike at Gulf and East Coast ports ended, operators and union members are now at an impasse — once again — over automation. Port operators say they need more technology to increase port efficiency, improve safety and to control costs. But union members say no, because some workers will lose their jobs. A new strike could come if an agreement isn't reached by January 15. And if that happens inflation could increase, when goods aren't flowing in an out of ports as quickly. Thursday union leaders met with President-elect Donald trump at Mar-a-Lago and walked away with his support. Writing about automation on Truth social, Trump said "the amount of money saved is nowhere near the distress, hurt, and harm it causes for American workers," and that foreign countries "...shouldn't be looking for every last penny knowing how many families are hurt." RELATED STORY | Billions of dollars of U.S. economic activity halted as port workers enter day two of their strike Professor Todd Belt of George Washington University called it Trump striking a different path than he did during his first term. "During the first Trump term you had Donald Trump, surrounded by a lot of people who were suggested to him by incumbent Republicans who had really a Republican orthodoxy on free trade. Donald trump now is going to be surrounded by a lot of people who support his ideas of interventionism and tariffs, as well as other trade policies that will protect working people at the expense of, of course, inflation," Belt said. The International Longshoremen's Association has until Jan. 15 to negotiate a new contract with the U.S. Maritime Alliance, which represents ports and shipping companies. At the heart of the dispute is whether ports can install automated gates, cranes and container-moving trucks that could make it faster to unload and load ships. The union argues that automation would lead to fewer jobs, even though higher levels of productivity could do more to boost the salaries of remaining workers. The Maritime Alliance said in a statement that the contract goes beyond ports to "supporting American consumers and giving American businesses access to the global marketplace — from farmers, to manufacturers, to small businesses, and innovative start-ups looking for new markets to sell their products." "To achieve this, we need modern technology that is proven to improve worker safety, boost port efficiency, increase port capacity, and strengthen our supply chains," said the alliance, adding that it looks forward to working with Trump. In October, the union representing 45,000 dockworkers went on strike for three days, raising the risk that a prolonged shutdown could push up inflation by making it difficult to unload container ships and export American products overseas. The issue pits an incoming president who won November's election on the promise of bringing down prices against commitments to support blue-collar workers along with the kinds of advanced technology that drew him support from Silicon Valley elite such as billionaire Elon Musk. Trump sought to portray the dispute as being between U.S. workers and foreign companies, but advanced ports are also key for staying globally competitive. China is opening a $1.3 billion port in Peru that could accommodate ships too large for the Panama Canal. There is a risk that shippers could move to other ports, which could also lead to job losses. Mexico is constructing a port that is highly automated, while Dubai, Singapore and Rotterdam already have more advanced ports. "For the great privilege of accessing our markets, these foreign companies should hire our incredible American Workers, instead of laying them off, and sending those profits back to foreign countries," Trump posted. "It is time to put AMERICA FIRST!" The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Ukraine must be in strong position for negotiations, Starmer saysGREENFIELD — Health New England has awarded grants to three local nonprofits that work to advance youth health and well-being in western Massachusetts. Just Roots farm is receiving $3,000 to fund its Food Access for Youth & Families Program while Community Action Pioneer Valley is getting $2,500 for its Youth & Workforce Development Programs and the Children’s Advocacy Center of Franklin County and North Quabbin is receiving $2,000 for its Creating a Culture of Belongingness Within Schools program. “Since COVID-19, youth health and well-being have been a regional priority for Health New England. We are proud to support organizations that are dedicated to improving the health and well-being of youth and adolescents,” Katie Bruno, Health New England’s public health and wellness program manager, said in a statement. “These grants highlight so many great regional organizations that share Health New England’s commitment to advancing and empowering the next generation to lead a healthy, successful life.” Joshua Faller, program director at Just Roots who is moving into a co-executive director role, said the $3,000 grant allows the farm to further its mission of improving food access through subsidized farm shares and operational support. “It makes us better equipped to effect lasting change,” he said, praising Health New England. “Together we’re making strides toward a more equitable future for everybody.” Faller said fostering access to nutritious food improves physical health and mental well-being. Jeffrey Trant, executive director of the Children’s Advocacy Center of Franklin County and North Quabbin, said the $2,000 in grant money covered the costs of an Oct. 30 conference at Greenfield Community College that included 150 educators from at least 24 schools and districts, as well as keynote speaker Gaelin Elmore, a former NFL player. “It was amazing,” Trant said. “His message really spoke to what are the concrete, tangible things that educators can do tomorrow to help [promote] belongingness in the classroom.” Article continues after... Cross|Word Flipart Typeshift SpellTower Really Bad Chess Health New England recently dispensed $80,000 in Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging (DEIB) grants that went to 38 organizations in Franklin, Hampshire, Hampden, Berkshire and Worcester counties. These grants are designed to support local nonprofits that focus on health equity and engage around at least one social determinant of health — conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age that affect health, quality of life and life expectancy. These conditions include socioeconomic status, food insecurity, education, access to health care, safe housing, discrimination, violence and trauma. Reach Domenic Poli at: dpoli@recorder.com or 413-930-4120.Donald Trump Calls On Feds To Either Explain The Mystery Drones Or Shoot Them Down
Romania Premier Ciolacu leads with 25% votes in first round of presidential electionIn the corridors of power that govern corporate strategy, treasurers have long worked in relative obscurity. Their desks are often buried in spreadsheets, their emails filled with queries about cash positions, liquidity forecasts and hedging strategies. But as economic uncertainty persists and businesses race toward digital transformation, the treasurer is quietly emerging as a central figure — a nexus of financial precision, risk management and growth strategy. That’s according to many of the experts PYMNTS spoke to for the B2B Payments: Outlook 2030 event, who collectively stressed that in an era defined by economic volatility, regulatory complexities and accelerating digital transformation, the corporate treasurer’s role has evolved far beyond its traditional scope. Involving treasurers in decision-making can help unlock financial expertise that enhances liquidity management, mitigates risks, drives operational efficiency and ensures access to capital. After all, a key element of any business success lies in cross-functional support and the treasury function’s holistic view of the company’s financial health enables them to act as strategic partners, ensuring that business objectives are achieved with precision and resilience. From navigating economic volatility to unlocking growth opportunities grounded in financial acumen and enhancing risk management and compliance while leading digital transformation, the treasurer is emerging as the unsung hero of the back office, and one of the most important, frequently untapped, strategic assets a business might have. Read more : Unlocking the Critical Role of Treasurers in Corporate Decision-Making Navigating Economic Volatility While Unlocking Growth The global economy has become a gauntlet of unpredictability . Inflation remains stubbornly high in many regions, supply chain disruptions continue to ripple through industries, and geopolitical tensions inject a layer of risk that no business can afford to ignore. In this environment, real-time financial precision is no longer a luxury — it’s becoming a necessity. “The market is evolving, and institutions need tools that can evolve with it,” Norman Marraccini , senior vice president of products and services at FIS , told PYMNTS. Treasurers are harnessing advanced tools such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to deliver up-to-the-minute insights into their organizations’ financial health. These technologies can help allow them to monitor cash flow across global operations, forecast liquidity needs with uncanny accuracy and react instantly to emerging risks. And while many executives focus on topline growth, treasurers can be relied upon for ensuring the bottom line of a business remains robust. Their unique position within the organization helps give them a bird’s-eye view of financial operations, enabling them to identify inefficiencies, unlock trapped capital, and align financial resources with strategic priorities. “Many treasurers are thinking, ‘Well, how can I extract that last ounce of juice from my financial ecosystem ?’” Ambrish Bansal , global head of Liquidity and Cash Concentration Products for the Citi Treasury and Trade Solutions business, told PYMNTS. “I see the role of treasury becoming more central to [the enterprise’s] business strategy, to the growth strategy, to the expansion strategy,” Bansal said. See also : Treasury’s Digital Migration Creates Greater Synergies With Finance Function Leading Business Transformation From the Back Office The digital revolution sweeping through industries is redefining the treasurer’s role. As organizations adopt digital-first strategies, treasurers are often at the forefront, championing initiatives that enhance operational efficiency and financial visibility. “The treasury function has definitely increased in importance, and has definitely been enhanced in terms of the versatility that needs to be looked into,” Ole Matthiessen, global head of cash management at Germany’s Deutsche Bank , told PYMNTS in an interview . From automating accounts payable and receivable processes to even deploying blockchain solutions , treasurers are driving innovations that can ripple across the enterprise. They are also instrumental in implementing tools that integrate with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, ensuring that financial data flows seamlessly across departments. “Traditionally, a lot of time was spent just gathering data,” Albert Acevedo , senior vice president of treasury services at Priority , told PYMNTS. By embedding business intelligence (BI) tools, companies can access faster, deeper information. These tools not only aggregate data for trend analysis but also provide insights into specific departments or transactions, allowing businesses to make informed decisions swiftly. A key area of focus is combating financial crime. With sophisticated analytics tools, treasurers are more and more able to detect anomalies in payment flows that could indicate fraud or money laundering. They are also collaborating closely with IT departments to fortify defenses against cyberattacks, particularly those targeting payment systems and sensitive financial data. See also : Stronger Treasurer Roles Drive Financial Gains in Healthcare Firms Despite their growing influence, many treasurers remain an untapped resource within their organizations. According to PYMNTS Intelligence, a full 77% of treasurers believe that at least one department in their organization would benefit from closer collaboration with them. Within healthcare alone, more than 3 in 4 treasurers (76%) report at least one barrier to collaboration. But businesses that recognize the strategic potential of the treasury function, the benefits can be profound. As PYMNTS Intelligence has found, ultimately, treasurers with high levels of influence are far more likely to report that their companies have predictable cash flows, expect revenue to increase and are agile in responding to shifting marking conditions. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, the treasurer is no longer just the keeper of cash. They are the architect of the future. And perhaps it’s time they receive their due recognition.
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) — Republican senators pushed back on Sunday against criticism from Democrats that Tulsi Gabbard , Donald Trump’s pick to lead U.S. intelligence services , is “compromised” by her comments supportive of Russia and secret meetings , as a congresswoman, with Syria’s president, a close ally of the Kremlin and Iran. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat and veteran of combat missions in Iraq, said she had concerns about Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s choice to be director of national intelligence . “I think she’s compromised,” Duckworth said on CNN’s “State of the Union,” citing Gabbard’s 2017 trip to Syria, where she held talks with Syrian President Bashar Assad. Gabbard was a Democratic House member from Hawaii at the time. “The U.S. intelligence community has identified her as having troubling relationships with America’s foes. And so my worry is that she couldn’t pass a background check,” Duckworth said. Gabbard, who said last month she is joining the Republican Party, has served in the Army National Guard for more than two decades. She was deployed to Iraq and Kuwait and, according to the Hawaii National Guard, received a Combat Medical Badge in 2005 for “participation in combat operations under enemy hostile fire in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom III.” RELATED COVERAGE Senators took down one Trump Cabinet pick. But the fight over their authority is just beginning Trump’s Republican Party is increasingly winning union voters. It’s a shift seen in his labor pick An influx of outsiders and money turns Montana Republican, culminating in a Senate triumph Duckworth’s comments drew immediate backlash from Republicans. What to know about Trump’s second term: Staffing the administration: Here are the people Trump has picked for key positions so far. Plus, a look at recess appointments and how could Trump use them to fill his Cabinet. Follow all of our coverage as Donald Trump assembles his second administration. “For her to say ridiculous and outright dangerous words like that is wrong,” Sen. Markwayne Mullin, a Republican from Oklahoma, said on CNN, challenging Duckworth to retract her words. “That’s the most dangerous thing she could say — is that a United States lieutenant colonel in the United States Army is compromised and is an asset of Russia.” In recent days, other Democrats have accused Gabbard without evidence of being a “Russian asset.” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, has claimed, without offering details, that Gabbard is in Russian President Vladimir “Putin’s pocket.” Mullin and others say the criticism from Democrats is rooted in the fact that Gabbard left their party and has become a Trump ally. Democrats say they worry that Gabbard’s selection as national intelligence chief endangers ties with allies and gives Russia a win. Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat just elected to the Senate, said he would not describe Gabbard as a Russian asset, but said she had “very questionable judgment.” “The problem is if our foreign allies don’t trust the head of our intelligence agencies, they’ll stop sharing information with us,” Schiff said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” Gabbard in 2022 endorsed one of Russia’s justifications for invading Ukraine : the existence of dozens of U.S.-funded biolabs working on some of the world’s nastiest pathogens. The labs are part of an international effort to control outbreaks and stop bioweapons, but Moscow claimed Ukraine was using them to create deadly bioweapons. Gabbard said she just voiced concerns about protecting the labs. Gabbard also has suggested that Russia had legitimate security concerns in deciding to invade Ukraine, given its desire to join NATO. Republican Sen. Eric Schmitt of Missouri said he thought it was “totally ridiculous” that Gabbard was being cast as a Russian asset for having different political views. “It’s insulting. It’s a slur, quite frankly. There’s no evidence that she’s a asset of another country,” he said on NBC. Sen. James Lankford, another Oklahoma Republican, acknowledged having “lots of questions” for Gabbard as the Senate considers her nomination to lead the intelligence services. Lankford said on NBC that he wants to ask Gabbard about her meeting with Assad and some of her past comments about Russia. “We want to know what the purpose was and what the direction for that was. As a member of Congress, we want to get a chance to talk about past comments that she’s made and get them into full context,” Lankford said.
Cover Five: With pressure rising, Matt Rhule delivers Nebraska a bowl bid in Year 2DOVER, Del. (AP) — A Delaware judge has reaffirmed her ruling that Tesla must revoke Elon Musk’s multibillion-dollar pay package Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick on Monday denied a request by attorneys for Musk and Tesla’s corporate directors to vacate her ruling earlier this year requiring the company to rescind the unprecedented pay package. McCormick also rejected an equally unprecedented and massive fee request by plaintiff attorneys , who argued that they were entitled to legal fees in the form of Tesla stock valued at more than $5 billion. The judge said the attorneys were entitled to a fee award of $345 million. The rulings came in a lawsuit filed by a Tesla stockholder who challenged Musk’s 2018 compensation package. McCormick concluded in January that Musk engineered the landmark pay package in sham negotiations with directors who were not independent. The compensation package initially carried a potential maximum value of about $56 billion, but that sum has fluctuated over the years based on Tesla’s stock price. Following the court ruling, Tesla shareholders met in June and ratified Musk’s 2018 pay package for a second time, again by an overwhelming margin. Defense attorneys then argued that the second vote makes clear that Tesla shareholders, with full knowledge of the flaws in the 2018 process that McCormick pointed out, were adamant that Musk is entitled to the pay package. They asked the judge to vacate her order directing Tesla to rescind the pay package. McCormick, who seemed skeptical of the defense arguments during an August hearing, said in Monday’s ruling that those arguments were fatally flawed. “The large and talented group of defense firms got creative with the ratification argument, but their unprecedented theories go against multiple strains of settled law,” McCormick wrote in a 103-page opinion. The judge noted, among other things, that a stockholder vote standing alone cannot ratify a conflicted-controller transaction. “Even if a stockholder vote could have a ratifying effect, it could not do so here due to multiple, material misstatements in the proxy statement,” she added. Meanwhile, McCormick found that the $5.6 billion fee request by the shareholder’s attorneys, which at one time approached $7 billion based on Tesla’s trading price, went too far. “In a case about excessive compensation, that was a bold ask,” McCormick wrote. Attorneys for the Tesla shareholder argue that their work resulted in the “massive” benefit of returning shares to Tesla that otherwise would have gone to Musk and diluted the stock held by other Tesla investors. They value that benefit at $51.4 billion, using the difference between the stock price at the time of McCormick’s January ruling and the strike price of some 304 million stock options granted to Musk. While finding that the methodology used to calculate the fee request was sound, the judge noted that the Delaware’s Supreme Court has noted that fee award guidelines “must yield to the greater policy concern of preventing windfalls to counsel.” “The fee award here must yield in this way, because $5.6 billion is a windfall no matter the methodology used to justify it,” McCormick wrote. A fee award of $345 million, she said, was “an appropriate sum to reward a total victory.” The fee award amounts to almost exactly half the current record $688 million in legal fees awarded in 2008 in litigation stemming from the collapse of Enron.
By DAVID BAUDER Time magazine gave Donald Trump something it has never done for a Person of the Year designee: a lengthy fact-check of claims he made in an accompanying interview. Related Articles National Politics | Trump’s lawyers rebuff DA’s idea for upholding his hush money conviction, calling it ‘absurd’ National Politics | Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time National Politics | Ruling by a conservative Supreme Court could help blue states resist Trump policies National Politics | A nonprofit leader, a social worker: Here are the stories of the people on Biden’s clemency list National Politics | Nancy Pelosi hospitalized after she ‘sustained an injury’ on official trip to Luxembourg The fact-check accompanies a transcript of what the president-elect told the newsmagazine’s journalists. Described as a “12 minute read,” it calls into question 15 separate statements that Trump made. It was the second time Trump earned the Time accolade; he also won in 2016, the first year he was elected president. Time editors said it wasn’t a particularly hard choice over other finalists Kamala Harris, Elon Musk, Benjamin Netanyahu and Kate Middleton. Time said Friday that no other Person of the Year has been fact-checked in the near-century that the magazine has annually written about the figure that has had the greatest impact on the news. But it has done the same for past interviews with the likes of Joe Biden, Netanyahu and Trump. Such corrections have been a sticking point for Trump and his team in the past, most notably when ABC News did it during his only debate with Democrat Kamala Harris this fall. There was no immediate response to a request for comment on Friday. In the piece, Time called into question statements Trump made about border security, autism and the size of a crowd at one of his rallies. When the president-elect talked about the “massive” mandate he had received from voters, Time pointed out that former President Barack Obama won more electoral votes the two times he had run for president. The magazine also questioned Trump’s claim that he would do interviews with anyone who asked during the campaign, if he had the time. The candidate rejected a request to speak to CBS’ “60 Minutes,” the magazine said. “In the final months of his campaign, Trump prioritized interviews with podcasts over mainstream media,” reporters Simmone Shah and Leslie Dickstein wrote. David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder and https://bsky.app/profile/dbauder.bsky.social.N.B. doctor who touched woman without her consent gets 1 year of probationThitikul finishes eagle-birdie to win CME Group Tour Championship and claim record $4M prize
Connor Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd. Acquires 118,292 Shares of Option Care Health, Inc. (NASDAQ:OPCH)
Manila, 13 December 2024—To mark Human Rights Day, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and The Asia Foundation unveiled the "Cybersecurity for Human Rights in the Philippines" (C4HR-PH) initiative on 12 December. The Php16.8-million ($300,000) program aims to bolster the digital resilience of over 150 Philippine human rights organizations against cybersecurity threats like doxing, phishing, and coordinated attacks. As part of USAID and The Asia Foundation’s ongoing Initiative for Advancing Community Transformation (I-ACT) project, the "Cybersecurity for Human Rights in the Philippines" (C4HR-PH) initiative will provide tools and training to more than 150 local organizations across the country over ten months. Cybersecurity experts from The Asia Foundation will work closely with national human rights coalitions to design and deliver trainings in risk management, digital security assessments, phishing awareness, and the adoption of cybersecurity protocols such as multi-factor authentication and regular data backups. The tools and knowledge provided through C4HR-PH will help human rights defenders conduct their crucial advocacy work, safeguard private data, and advance justice and accountability without disruption or retribution. "Now more than ever, civil society organizations are reliant on technology and the internet to operate and pursue our advocacies," said Sheila Formento, National Coordinator of the Alternative Law Groups, a coalition of organizations that provide legal services to marginalized communities. "We welcome this partnership as it helps us protect our members who are constantly online and vulnerable to cyberattacks." C4HR-PH underscores USAID's commitment to fostering secure, empowered, and resilient organizations that can continue their critical work of promoting human rights and democracy. "Cyber resilience is not just about protecting data; it is about ensuring that democracy defenders can continue their vital work without fear of digital interference,” USAID Philippines Acting Mission Director Rebekah Eubanks said during the launch event attended by human rights advocates, cybersecurity experts, and other stakeholders. "This initiative reflects USAID’s commitment to fostering a safe and open digital space for civil society." "Civil society organizations are considered a high-risk community for cyberattacks because they can become under direct threat of malicious attackers but have limited defense capabilities. This crucial program will give our participants the tools and knowledge to better prevent disruptions, defend themselves, and continue to advance the work that they do," said The Asia Foundation Philippines Country Representative Sam Chittick.Rutgers looks to pick up steam in clash vs. Seton HallUkraine must be in strong position for negotiations, Starmer saysBlocked again | Court blocks second version of Harris Co. guaranteed income program
TikTok's future uncertain after appeals court rejects its bid to overturn possible US banTime magazine gave Donald Trump something it has never done for a designee: a lengthy fact-check of claims he made in an accompanying interview. The accompanies a transcript of what the president-elect told the newsmagazine’s journalists. Described as a “12 minute read,” it calls into question 15 separate statements that Trump made. It was the second time Trump earned the Time accolade; he also won in 2016, the first year he was elected president. Time editors said it wasn’t a particularly hard choice over other finalists Kamala Harris, Elon Musk, Benjamin Netanyahu and Kate Middleton. Time said Friday that no other Person of the Year has been fact-checked in the near-century that the magazine has annually written about the figure that has had the greatest impact on the news. But it has done the same for past interviews with the likes of Joe Biden, Netanyahu and Trump. Such corrections have been a sticking point for Trump and his team in the past, most notably when ABC News did it with Democrat Kamala Harris this fall. There was no immediate response to a request for comment on Friday. In the piece, Time called into question statements Trump made about border security, autism and the size of a crowd at one of his rallies. When the president-elect talked about the “massive” mandate he had received from voters, Time pointed out that former President Barack Obama won more electoral votes the two times he had run for president. The magazine also questioned Trump’s claim that he would do interviews with anyone who asked during the campaign, if he had the time. The candidate rejected a request to speak the magazine said. “In the final months of his campaign, Trump prioritized interviews with podcasts over mainstream media,” reporters Simmone Shah and Leslie Dickstein wrote.